data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5b75/c5b75b6528e7f169e96b2744347f0ae1dd34ae6d" alt="Karlsfield Red Light Camera"
Dan Campbell’s mother-in-law insists that while it appears to be her car in the citations she was not the driver.
Dan Campbell told reporters after last night’s council meeting, “I’m not even going to stand here and dignify the allegations that anyone in my immediate or extended family or their driving habits have anything to do with my feelings on traffic cameras and the fact that they are bad for the great City of Karlsfield. I think we all know that photos can be doctored, can be cropped and photoshopped and what have you, and you can’t always believe what you see.”
But that argument is a complete 180-degree turnaround from his position just three years ago. He was quoted in 2010, when the camera debate first was brought to the City Council, as saying: “It stands to reason that the technological benefits far outweigh any upfront costs associated with installing these cameras, and nationwide studies have proven across the board that the revenue generated from the use of these cameras proving these traffic violations will more than pay for the costs of their installation. We would be foolish to pass up this opportunity. The technology that produce (sic) these photographs is state-of-the-art, and any scofflaw that would question the validity of any traffic citation they receive as a result of these cameras would be grasping at straws.”
Continue reading